mirror of
https://github.com/bertptrs/tracing-mutex.git
synced 2025-12-25 12:40:31 +01:00
Merge pull request #1 from bertptrs/improve-digraph
This commit is contained in:
20
CHANGELOG.md
Normal file
20
CHANGELOG.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
# Changelog
|
||||
All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
|
||||
|
||||
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/), and this project
|
||||
adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
|
||||
|
||||
## [Unreleased]
|
||||
|
||||
### Changed
|
||||
- New data structure for interal dependency graph, resulting in quicker graph updates.
|
||||
|
||||
### Fixed
|
||||
- Fixed an issue where internal graph ordering indices were exponential rather than sequential.
|
||||
|
||||
## [0.1.0] - 2020-05-16
|
||||
|
||||
Initial release.
|
||||
|
||||
[Unreleased]: https://github.com/bertptrs/tracing-mutex/compare/v0.1.0...HEAD
|
||||
[0.1.0]: https://github.com/bertptrs/tracing-mutex/releases/tag/v0.1.0
|
||||
@@ -13,3 +13,6 @@ repository = "https://github.com/bertptrs/tracing-mutex"
|
||||
|
||||
[dependencies]
|
||||
lazy_static = "1"
|
||||
|
||||
[dev-dependencies]
|
||||
rand = "0.8"
|
||||
|
||||
155
src/graph.rs
155
src/graph.rs
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
|
||||
use std::array::IntoIter;
|
||||
use std::cell::Cell;
|
||||
use std::collections::HashMap;
|
||||
use std::collections::HashSet;
|
||||
use std::hash::Hash;
|
||||
@@ -18,17 +20,28 @@ type Order = usize;
|
||||
/// visibly changed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [paper]: https://whileydave.com/publications/pk07_jea/
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Default, Debug)]
|
||||
#[derive(Default, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct DiGraph<V>
|
||||
where
|
||||
V: Eq + Hash + Copy,
|
||||
{
|
||||
in_edges: HashMap<V, HashSet<V>>,
|
||||
out_edges: HashMap<V, HashSet<V>>,
|
||||
nodes: HashMap<V, Node<V>>,
|
||||
/// Next topological sort order
|
||||
next_ord: Order,
|
||||
/// Topological sort order. Order is not guaranteed to be contiguous
|
||||
ord: HashMap<V, Order>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||||
struct Node<V>
|
||||
where
|
||||
V: Eq + Hash + Clone,
|
||||
{
|
||||
in_edges: HashSet<V>,
|
||||
out_edges: HashSet<V>,
|
||||
// The "Ord" field is a Cell to ensure we can update it in an immutable context.
|
||||
// `std::collections::HashMap` doesn't let you have multiple mutable references to elements, but
|
||||
// this way we can use immutable references and still update `ord`. This saves quite a few
|
||||
// hashmap lookups in the final reorder function.
|
||||
ord: Cell<Order>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<V> DiGraph<V>
|
||||
@@ -44,29 +57,36 @@ where
|
||||
/// New nodes are appended to the end of the topological order when added.
|
||||
fn add_node(&mut self, n: V) -> (&mut HashSet<V>, &mut HashSet<V>, Order) {
|
||||
let next_ord = &mut self.next_ord;
|
||||
let in_edges = self.in_edges.entry(n).or_default();
|
||||
let out_edges = self.out_edges.entry(n).or_default();
|
||||
|
||||
let order = *self.ord.entry(n).or_insert_with(|| {
|
||||
let node = self.nodes.entry(n).or_insert_with(|| {
|
||||
let order = *next_ord;
|
||||
*next_ord += next_ord.checked_add(1).expect("Topological order overflow");
|
||||
order
|
||||
*next_ord = next_ord.checked_add(1).expect("Topological order overflow");
|
||||
|
||||
Node {
|
||||
ord: Cell::new(order),
|
||||
in_edges: Default::default(),
|
||||
out_edges: Default::default(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
(in_edges, out_edges, order)
|
||||
(&mut node.in_edges, &mut node.out_edges, node.ord.get())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) fn remove_node(&mut self, n: V) -> bool {
|
||||
match self.out_edges.remove(&n) {
|
||||
match self.nodes.remove(&n) {
|
||||
None => false,
|
||||
Some(out_edges) => {
|
||||
for other in out_edges {
|
||||
self.in_edges.get_mut(&other).unwrap().remove(&n);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Some(Node {
|
||||
out_edges,
|
||||
in_edges,
|
||||
..
|
||||
}) => {
|
||||
out_edges.into_iter().for_each(|m| {
|
||||
self.nodes.get_mut(&m).unwrap().in_edges.remove(&n);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
for other in self.in_edges.remove(&n).unwrap() {
|
||||
self.out_edges.get_mut(&other).unwrap().remove(&n);
|
||||
}
|
||||
in_edges.into_iter().for_each(|m| {
|
||||
self.nodes.get_mut(&m).unwrap().out_edges.remove(&n);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
true
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -96,25 +116,25 @@ where
|
||||
|
||||
if lb < ub {
|
||||
// This edge might introduce a cycle, need to recompute the topological sort
|
||||
let mut visited = HashSet::new();
|
||||
let mut visited = IntoIter::new([x, y]).collect();
|
||||
let mut delta_f = Vec::new();
|
||||
let mut delta_b = Vec::new();
|
||||
|
||||
if !self.dfs_f(y, ub, &mut visited, &mut delta_f) {
|
||||
if !self.dfs_f(&self.nodes[&y], ub, &mut visited, &mut delta_f) {
|
||||
// This edge introduces a cycle, so we want to reject it and remove it from the
|
||||
// graph again to keep the "does not contain cycles" invariant.
|
||||
|
||||
// We use map instead of unwrap to avoid an `unwrap()` but we know that these
|
||||
// entries are present as we just added them above.
|
||||
self.in_edges.get_mut(&y).map(|nodes| nodes.remove(&x));
|
||||
self.out_edges.get_mut(&x).map(|nodes| nodes.remove(&y));
|
||||
self.nodes.get_mut(&y).map(|node| node.in_edges.remove(&x));
|
||||
self.nodes.get_mut(&x).map(|node| node.out_edges.remove(&x));
|
||||
|
||||
// No edge was added
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// No need to check as we should've found the cycle on the forward pass
|
||||
self.dfs_b(x, lb, &mut visited, &mut delta_b);
|
||||
self.dfs_b(&self.nodes[&x], lb, &mut visited, &mut delta_b);
|
||||
|
||||
// Original paper keeps it around but this saves us from clearing it
|
||||
drop(visited);
|
||||
@@ -126,19 +146,26 @@ where
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Forwards depth-first-search
|
||||
fn dfs_f(&self, n: V, ub: Order, visited: &mut HashSet<V>, delta_f: &mut Vec<V>) -> bool {
|
||||
visited.insert(n);
|
||||
fn dfs_f<'a>(
|
||||
&'a self,
|
||||
n: &'a Node<V>,
|
||||
ub: Order,
|
||||
visited: &mut HashSet<V>,
|
||||
delta_f: &mut Vec<&'a Node<V>>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
delta_f.push(n);
|
||||
|
||||
self.out_edges[&n].iter().all(|w| {
|
||||
let order = self.ord[w];
|
||||
n.out_edges.iter().all(|w| {
|
||||
let node = &self.nodes[w];
|
||||
let ord = node.ord.get();
|
||||
|
||||
if order == ub {
|
||||
if ord == ub {
|
||||
// Found a cycle
|
||||
false
|
||||
} else if !visited.contains(w) && order < ub {
|
||||
} else if !visited.contains(w) && ord < ub {
|
||||
// Need to check recursively
|
||||
self.dfs_f(*w, ub, visited, delta_f)
|
||||
visited.insert(*w);
|
||||
self.dfs_f(node, ub, visited, delta_f)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Already seen this one or not interesting
|
||||
true
|
||||
@@ -147,31 +174,34 @@ where
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Backwards depth-first-search
|
||||
fn dfs_b(&self, n: V, lb: Order, visited: &mut HashSet<V>, delta_b: &mut Vec<V>) {
|
||||
visited.insert(n);
|
||||
fn dfs_b<'a>(
|
||||
&'a self,
|
||||
n: &'a Node<V>,
|
||||
lb: Order,
|
||||
visited: &mut HashSet<V>,
|
||||
delta_b: &mut Vec<&'a Node<V>>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
delta_b.push(n);
|
||||
|
||||
for w in &self.in_edges[&n] {
|
||||
if !visited.contains(w) && lb < self.ord[w] {
|
||||
self.dfs_b(*w, lb, visited, delta_b);
|
||||
for w in &n.in_edges {
|
||||
let node = &self.nodes[w];
|
||||
if !visited.contains(w) && lb < node.ord.get() {
|
||||
visited.insert(*w);
|
||||
|
||||
self.dfs_b(node, lb, visited, delta_b);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn reorder(&mut self, mut delta_f: Vec<V>, mut delta_b: Vec<V>) {
|
||||
fn reorder(&self, mut delta_f: Vec<&Node<V>>, mut delta_b: Vec<&Node<V>>) {
|
||||
self.sort(&mut delta_f);
|
||||
self.sort(&mut delta_b);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut l = Vec::with_capacity(delta_f.len() + delta_b.len());
|
||||
let mut orders = Vec::with_capacity(delta_f.len() + delta_b.len());
|
||||
|
||||
for w in delta_b {
|
||||
orders.push(self.ord[&w]);
|
||||
l.push(w);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for v in delta_f {
|
||||
orders.push(self.ord[&v]);
|
||||
for v in delta_b.into_iter().chain(delta_f) {
|
||||
orders.push(v.ord.get());
|
||||
l.push(v);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -180,18 +210,21 @@ where
|
||||
orders.sort_unstable();
|
||||
|
||||
for (node, order) in l.into_iter().zip(orders) {
|
||||
self.ord.insert(node, order);
|
||||
node.ord.set(order);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn sort(&self, ids: &mut [V]) {
|
||||
fn sort(&self, ids: &mut [&Node<V>]) {
|
||||
// Can use unstable sort because mutex ids should not be equal
|
||||
ids.sort_unstable_by_key(|v| self.ord[v]);
|
||||
ids.sort_unstable_by_key(|v| &v.ord);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod tests {
|
||||
use rand::seq::SliceRandom;
|
||||
use rand::thread_rng;
|
||||
|
||||
use super::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -210,4 +243,32 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// Add an edge that should reorder 0 to be after 4
|
||||
assert!(graph.add_edge(4, 0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Fuzz the DiGraph implementation by adding a bunch of valid edges.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This test generates all possible forward edges in a 100-node graph consisting of natural
|
||||
/// numbers, shuffles them, then adds them to the graph. This will always be a valid directed,
|
||||
/// acyclic graph because there is a trivial order (the natural numbers) but because the edges
|
||||
/// are added in a random order the DiGraph will still occassionally need to reorder nodes.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn fuzz_digraph() {
|
||||
// Note: this fuzzer is quadratic in the number of nodes, so this cannot be too large or it
|
||||
// will slow down the tests too much.
|
||||
const NUM_NODES: usize = 100;
|
||||
let mut edges = Vec::with_capacity(NUM_NODES * NUM_NODES);
|
||||
|
||||
for i in 0..NUM_NODES {
|
||||
for j in i..NUM_NODES {
|
||||
edges.push((i, j));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
edges.shuffle(&mut thread_rng());
|
||||
|
||||
let mut graph = DiGraph::default();
|
||||
|
||||
for (x, y) in edges {
|
||||
assert!(graph.add_edge(x, y));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
34
src/lib.rs
34
src/lib.rs
@@ -89,9 +89,6 @@ lazy_static! {
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This type is currently private to prevent usage while the exact implementation is figured out,
|
||||
/// but it will likely be public in the future.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// One possible alteration is to make this type not `Copy` but `Drop`, and handle deregistering
|
||||
/// the lock from there.
|
||||
struct MutexId(usize);
|
||||
|
||||
impl MutexId {
|
||||
@@ -271,6 +268,9 @@ fn get_dependency_graph() -> impl DerefMut<Target = DiGraph<usize>> {
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod tests {
|
||||
use rand::seq::SliceRandom;
|
||||
use rand::thread_rng;
|
||||
|
||||
use super::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -303,4 +303,32 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// If b's destructor correctly ran correctly we can now add an edge from c to a.
|
||||
assert!(get_dependency_graph().add_edge(c.value(), a.value()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Fuzz the global dependency graph by fake-acquiring lots of mutexes in a valid order.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This test generates all possible forward edges in a 100-node graph consisting of natural
|
||||
/// numbers, shuffles them, then adds them to the graph. This will always be a valid directed,
|
||||
/// acyclic graph because there is a trivial order (the natural numbers) but because the edges
|
||||
/// are added in a random order the DiGraph will still occassionally need to reorder nodes.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn fuzz_mutex_id() {
|
||||
const NUM_NODES: usize = 100;
|
||||
|
||||
let ids: Vec<MutexId> = (0..NUM_NODES).map(|_| Default::default()).collect();
|
||||
|
||||
let mut edges = Vec::with_capacity(NUM_NODES * NUM_NODES);
|
||||
for i in 0..NUM_NODES {
|
||||
for j in i..NUM_NODES {
|
||||
edges.push((i, j));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
edges.shuffle(&mut thread_rng());
|
||||
|
||||
for (x, y) in edges {
|
||||
// Acquire the mutexes, smallest first to ensure a cycle-free graph
|
||||
let _ignored = ids[x].get_borrowed();
|
||||
let _ = ids[y].get_borrowed();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user